Skip to main content

Exercise: Price control

Your city council voted to set a price ceiling on the market for good X. The price ceiling is set to be equal to 75% of the current equilibrium price. 

The current market demand can be modeled by the equation:
 
The market supply curve corresponds to the following equation:
 
Using the given information, find:
  • the new price and the new amount of quantity sold 
  • the shortage
  • a tax per unit of good sold that would result in the same quantity that is available at the price ceiling
    • Derive an equation for the new market supply curve with the tax.
First, let's derive the equilibrium price and quantity for this market. Set the demand curve equal to the supply curve.

Now that we know the original price (i.e Pe), we can derive the price ceiling and the quantity sold at that price:
From our notes, we know that the quantity sold at that price must be equal to the amount that can be supplied by the producers. Therefore, all we need to do is to plug the new price into the supply curve equation and solve for Q.

The shortage is the difference between the quantity demanded and the quantity produced at a given price:

So the shortage is equal to 31.25 units. Or in other words, if producers were able to produce 31.25 more units at the given price, no price ceiling would be needed.

In order to find a per unit tax that would result in the same amount of quantity consumed as the price ceiling, one needs to understand that the tax would shift the supply curve to the left. Intersecting the demand curve where the quantity is equal to 12.5 (why?). Once we know the price that consumers are willing to pay, the tax is equal to the distance between the price ceiling and the new price for the demand curve at the given quantity.

Since we found the per unit tax, the new supply curve can be modeled by the following equation:


Let's visualize the problem:



The new supply curve (S2) has the same slope as S1. The only difference is that the constant factor in S2 includes the per unit tax, which causes this leftward shift. Furthermore, the tax is equal to difference between PT and PC on the graph. 









Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up
Post a Comment
Read more

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,
Post a Comment
Read more

Econometrics: OLS estimates

  Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op
Post a Comment
Read more