Skip to main content

Microeconomics: Shift in Demand

Whenever there is a shift in the demand or supply curve, the equilibrium price and quantity change. In this post we will explore the impact of a change in the market demand, and the factors that cause these shifts.

Determinants of Demand: changes in demand are caused by changes in consumers' tastes, consumers' incomes, and the price of related goods.
  • Consumers' tastes: if the preference for a particular good increases then the demand curve shifts to the right to represent the increase in demand. If there is a decrease in the preference of a good, then the demand decreases which is presented by the shift of the demand curve to the left.
  • Consumers' incomes: the amount of money available to buy goods and services. For normal goods, an increase (decrease) in income results in an increase (decrease) in demand.
  • Change in the price of related goods:
    • Complementary goods: goods that are consumed together, for example buns and hot dogs. If the price of a good decreases, then the demand for the complement good increases.
    • Substitute goods: goods that are consumed in place of each other. If the price of a good increases, the demand for its substitute increases. On the other hand, if the price of a good decreases, then the demand for its substitute decreases.
Example: 

If a new scientific report discovers that eating apples increases life expectancy, consumers' preference will change. The consumers are now willing to buy more apples then before, which causes the demand curve to shift to the right. The shift is represented by D2 which illustrates the new demand curve. The line D1 represents the demand curve before the report was published. As expected, the equilibrium price and quantity are now higher.


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 56-59.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,

Econometrics: OLS estimates

  Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op