Skip to main content

Price and Quantity controls: Price Floor

After exploring the concept of a price ceiling in a previous post. It is time define the term "price floor". A price floor can be thought as the opposite definition of a price ceiling, where the latter can be described as setting a maximum price that must be smaller than the current equilibrium price. The former is a minimum price that must be greater than the equilibrium price.

If a government finds the that the market equilibrium price for a good to be too low, it may impose a minimum price that is greater than the current market price. The quantity demanded is lower than the quantity supplied. The market produces more than the consumers are willing to buy at that price. This results in a surplus which can be represented by the distance between the quantity consumed and the quantity supplied at the new imposed price in the market.

Real life examples of price floors can be found in the agriculture and energy industries, or in the labor market (minimum wage). Recently, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission imposed a price floor on the renewable power resource providers in New York's capacity market.

Example:


The government decides to put in place a minimum price on corn crops. Assuming that this market is competitive, then the new binding price (PC) causes the quantity demanded to be less than the quantity produced. This results in a surplus in the market. The amount of people willing to buy corn crops (QD) at the new given price is smaller than the amount supplied by the producers (QS). The new amount of corn crops consumed in the market is now lower than it was before the price floor (QE>QD).


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 64.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...

Exercise: short and long run effects of a fiscal policy

  You are in charge of the government budget for the year 2021. You are told that schools and public roads need to be updated, and you estimate an appropriate budget in order to carry out the task. Describe what will happen in the short run to the economy, and what type of inflation do we see? Describe the supply side effect from this policy, explain what happens in the long run. Assume that there is no crowding out effect. First, note that updating public infractures, assuming taxes stay the same, will require an increase in government spending, which will also have an impact on the investment and consumption level in the economy (remember the spending multiplier?). Therefore, the aggregate demand curve will shift to the right. This will cause inflation (i.e positive change in the price level) and a higher output in the short-run.  Note that if we were to assume a large crowding out effect, the short run aggregate supply curve would shift to the left (increase in production c...

Exercise: maximizing profit

Assume that you are the owner of a small business that produces T-shirts. Your the total revenue for your business can be modeled by the following equation: and your total cost corresponds to this function: Find the point at which your firm maximizes its profit. Then, find how much profit the firm if able to earn at that point. Using the total cost and total revenue functions we can set up the profit function: Then, realize that if you want to find the maximum profit, take the derivative of the function and set it up equal to zero, and solve for Q. This is equivalent of taking the derivative of the total cost and total revenue functions and setting them equal to each other. In this problem, I chose the latter option as it was explained in the previous lessons. Notice that profit is often denoted by a capital pi.  We are assuming that the TR>TC for some positive value, you can check for yourself. However, if we did not know that, we would first take the first ...