Skip to main content

Price and Quantity controls: Price Floor

After exploring the concept of a price ceiling in a previous post. It is time define the term "price floor". A price floor can be thought as the opposite definition of a price ceiling, where the latter can be described as setting a maximum price that must be smaller than the current equilibrium price. The former is a minimum price that must be greater than the equilibrium price.

If a government finds the that the market equilibrium price for a good to be too low, it may impose a minimum price that is greater than the current market price. The quantity demanded is lower than the quantity supplied. The market produces more than the consumers are willing to buy at that price. This results in a surplus which can be represented by the distance between the quantity consumed and the quantity supplied at the new imposed price in the market.

Real life examples of price floors can be found in the agriculture and energy industries, or in the labor market (minimum wage). Recently, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission imposed a price floor on the renewable power resource providers in New York's capacity market.

Example:


The government decides to put in place a minimum price on corn crops. Assuming that this market is competitive, then the new binding price (PC) causes the quantity demanded to be less than the quantity produced. This results in a surplus in the market. The amount of people willing to buy corn crops (QD) at the new given price is smaller than the amount supplied by the producers (QS). The new amount of corn crops consumed in the market is now lower than it was before the price floor (QE>QD).


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 64.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more