Skip to main content

Welfare Analysis

Now that we know the basic principals that affect the market supply and demand curves, we can turn our attention to the welfare analysis of the market and see how the economic value  is divided between the producers and the consumers.
  • Consumer surplus is the difference between the price a consumer is willing to pay and the current market price. The consumer surplus is equal to the area bounded from above by the demand curve and bounded from below by the equilibrium price.
  • Producer Surplus is the difference between the price a producer is willing to sell and the current market price. This is equal to the area bounded from above by the equilibrium market price and bounded from below by the supply curve.
  • Total economic surplus is the sum of consumer and producer surpluses. It is maximized at the equilibrium price and quantity point.
  • Dead-weight loss is the sum producer and consumer surplus that could have been achieved had the equilibrium price and quantity prevailed in the market. Therefore, if the current price is the market clearing price, there is no dead-weight loss in the market.

Example: 

In this first example, the total economic surplus is maximized. The quantity and price are determined by the intersection of the supply and demand curve.

In the second graph, we see that due to a per unit tax, the supply curve shifts to the left.  A dead-weight loss is created (the triangle area between Qt and QE) and part of the consumer and producer surplus now goes to government. The area is denoted as "Government Surplus", and represents the total revenue created by the tax. Due to the dead-weight loss,  the total economic surplus is smaller than before.


 Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 65-66.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more