Skip to main content

Exercise: Cost in the short run

We have so far talked about the short run cost for firms. It is now time to do some problems to make sure that the reader gets conformable with these types of problems. Exercise 1 requires the use of a cost data table, and exercise 2 requires knowledge in Calculus.

 1). A firm has the following cost data:
Ouput (Q) Total Cost (TC)  Variable Cost (VC)
 523
$6500
$2500
 524
$6725
$2725
 525
$7025
$3025

Find the ATC, AFC, AVC, and MC at these output levels.

Remember the total cost formula:



Then, in order to find FC just do the following:


Finally all you need to do is to divide each of these terms by each output level to find the ATC, AFC, and AVC. 

Regarding the MC, remember the formula:



Then,

Solution to problem 1:
ATC  AFC  AVC  MC
$(6500/523)
$(4000/523)
$(2500/523)
n.a
$(6725/524)
$(4000/524)
$(2725/524)
$225
$(7025/525)
$(4000/525)
$(3025/525)
$300


2). A firm's short run total cost function is as follows:


Find the ATC, AVC and MC functions, then graph the curves with respect to output (assume TC=525 when Q=0).

FC is just a constant and VC must be equal to 0 when no output is being produced:


Then, just divide VC, FC, and TC by Q:

Another way to find the MC which was mentioned in the previous lecture is by taking the derivative of TC or VC with respect to Q:


Let's graph the curves:



Source: the problems were inspired by the exercises on page 129 in Study Guide For Microeconomics, 8th edition (2013) by J.Hamilton, and V.Suslow.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more