Skip to main content

Microeconomics: perfect competition

Perfect competition happens when both buyers and producers are price takers, meaning they have no (individual) influence over the price of a product.

Conditions for perfect competition:
  1. Large number of producers such that no individual producer's production represents a significant part of the total output in the market. Producers must sell their products (no matter the quantity) at a market price that is outside of their control (price-taker). This means that for firm that is a price-taker, its demand is perfectly elastic (horizontal).
  2. Producers sell homogeneous goods, meaning that consumers do not care from which sellers they buy the goods from.
  3. Producers do not face barriers to entry or exit. Producers are able to enter or exit the market freely.
Understanding economic graphs under perfect competition:


  • The price (Pm) is determined in the market becomes the demand curve for an individual firm (remember the firm is price-taker). Then, if the demand is horizontal, it follows by the product rule in calculus, the marginal revenue is constant.

  • Remember, the profit maximizing output is determined by MR=MC.
  • The long run equilibrium is achieved as each individual firm is earning a normal profit (see graph above). If a firm is earning a negative or positive normal profit, firms will exit (enter) the market until a normal profit is achieved at an individual firm level.
  • The firm represented on the graph produces efficiently as it is producing at the lowest point on its average total cost (ATC) curve.

  • An increase in price causes an increase in output. This creates a new marginal revenue equal to the new equilibrium price (Pm2) that is bigger than the original price (Pm1).
  • The firm now produces where Pm2=MR2=MC. At this point, the firm is earning a positive economic profit, in the short run, as Pm2>ATC at the new quantity being produced.
  • Profit is equal to the vertical distance between Pm2 and ATC times the number of goods produced by the firm at that price.
  • The firm is not productively efficient, as it is not s it is producing at the lowest point on its average total cost (ATC) curve.
In the long run, the positive economic profit attracts other firms to enter the market. This new influx of firms will move the supply curve to the right, thereby increasing supply and decreasing the equilibrium price until every firm earns a normal profit.

Should a firm exit the market in the short run if it faces a negative profit? It depends, if the firm is able to cover its variable costs, then it stays in the market. If it cannot cover its variable cost, the firm should exit the market immediately.

The graph on the left indicates that the firm should still operate as it is able to cover its AV costs at that price. However, the firm on the right cannot cover its ATC and has to exit the market.

In the long run, negative economic profit pushes away some firms out of the market, thereby decreasing the supply and increasing the equilibrium price, until every firm earns a normal profit.

Part A of the graph shows that due to a leftward shift in demand (from D1 to D3), the new price Pm3<Pm1. Some firms are experiencing losses and are forced out of the market, reducing supply (S1 to S3). This shift in supply happens up until every firm is making a normal profit which occurs at Pm1.


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 91-99. 




Labels:
Location: New York, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more