Skip to main content

Microeconomics: monopolistic competition

Monopolistic Competition:

It is a market structure that has similarities with both perfect competition and monopoly.

  • Similarities with perfect competition:
    • There are multiple firms competing against each other. One common example is fast food chain restaurants.
    • Low barriers to entry. Therefore a firm can easily enter a monopolistic competitive market.   
    • In the short run, firms can earn an economic profit. In the long run, the economic profit attracts other firms up until the economic profit disappear. 
  • Similarities with monopoly:
    • Monopolistic competitive firms have the ability to set a price for their products, though changing prices affects quantity sold proportionally more than for a monopolist.
    • Each firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve due to their pricing power, but it is more elastic (i.e flatter) than for a monopolist.
    • Since each firm faces a downward-sloping demand, the marginal revenue is less than demand.
  •  Unique features:
    • In order to earn an economic profit, each firm produces a different products from their competitors. A firm's effort to differentiate its product from other firms is called product differentiation.
    • Firms spend some of their resources on advertising their products. This is done in order to create brand loyalty push the idea that their products is different than the products produced by their competitors.
Monopolistic competition in the short-run:

  • product differentiation allows a monopolistically competitive firm to earn an economic profit in the short run.
  • Product differentiation causes a firm's demand and marginal revenue to be downward sloping.
  • Firms maximize profit when producing at the quantity where the marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
  • Monopolistically competitive firms are inefficient in the short run:
    • Productively inefficient as the quantity produce is not on the lowest point of the average total cost curve.
    • Allocatively inefficient since the price earned is not equal to the marginal cost. Thus creating a dead-weight loss in the market.


Monopolistic competition in the long run:


  • As long as P>ATC (i.e positive profit), more firms want to enter the market and compete.
  • As new firms enter the market, demand for existing firm's product decreasing (demand shifts left) until no firms earn a positive economic profit.
  • Unlike in perfect competition, the long run equilibrium is neither productively or allocativelly efficient.
  • Monopolistically-competitive firms do not produce at the lowest point of the ATC. The difference between  the output at the lowest point on the ATC curve and the long run equilibrium output is called excess capacity.


References: 
Labels:
Location: New York, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more