Skip to main content

Microeconomics: monopolistic competition

Monopolistic Competition:

It is a market structure that has similarities with both perfect competition and monopoly.

  • Similarities with perfect competition:
    • There are multiple firms competing against each other. One common example is fast food chain restaurants.
    • Low barriers to entry. Therefore a firm can easily enter a monopolistic competitive market.   
    • In the short run, firms can earn an economic profit. In the long run, the economic profit attracts other firms up until the economic profit disappear. 
  • Similarities with monopoly:
    • Monopolistic competitive firms have the ability to set a price for their products, though changing prices affects quantity sold proportionally more than for a monopolist.
    • Each firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve due to their pricing power, but it is more elastic (i.e flatter) than for a monopolist.
    • Since each firm faces a downward-sloping demand, the marginal revenue is less than demand.
  •  Unique features:
    • In order to earn an economic profit, each firm produces a different products from their competitors. A firm's effort to differentiate its product from other firms is called product differentiation.
    • Firms spend some of their resources on advertising their products. This is done in order to create brand loyalty push the idea that their products is different than the products produced by their competitors.
Monopolistic competition in the short-run:

  • product differentiation allows a monopolistically competitive firm to earn an economic profit in the short run.
  • Product differentiation causes a firm's demand and marginal revenue to be downward sloping.
  • Firms maximize profit when producing at the quantity where the marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
  • Monopolistically competitive firms are inefficient in the short run:
    • Productively inefficient as the quantity produce is not on the lowest point of the average total cost curve.
    • Allocatively inefficient since the price earned is not equal to the marginal cost. Thus creating a dead-weight loss in the market.


Monopolistic competition in the long run:


  • As long as P>ATC (i.e positive profit), more firms want to enter the market and compete.
  • As new firms enter the market, demand for existing firm's product decreasing (demand shifts left) until no firms earn a positive economic profit.
  • Unlike in perfect competition, the long run equilibrium is neither productively or allocativelly efficient.
  • Monopolistically-competitive firms do not produce at the lowest point of the ATC. The difference between  the output at the lowest point on the ATC curve and the long run equilibrium output is called excess capacity.


References: 
Labels:
Location: New York, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up
Post a Comment
Read more

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,
Post a Comment
Read more

Econometrics: OLS estimates

  Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op
Post a Comment
Read more