Skip to main content

Microeconomics: Natural Monopoly

Notes on natural monopolies:

  • Recall that natural monopolies arise because they have economies of scale so large, their size prevents competition from smaller firms.


  • You can see the large area of the dead-weight loss that typically occurs in a natural monopoly. However, unlike other monopolies which can be broken up into smaller parts (see trust-busting), breaking up a natural monopoly would be less productively efficient as the ATC and MC curves would be higher. 

  • Government regulation of the firm's prices for its goods.
    • The government allows the monopoly to exist, since its economies of scale is so large, it produces at a much lower average total cost (ATC) than multiple smaller firms producing the same amount of goods.
    • The government's goal is to reduce the DWL.
The graphs below show the differences between a productively and allocatively efficient prices, using the graph of an unregulated natural monopoly used at the beginning of this lesson.

Productively efficient price (P(Q)=ATC):


You can see that by setting the price equal to the intersection of the demand curve to the ATC curve, the DWL is now smaller and the consumer surplus higher. Furthermore, the market is productively efficient.

Allocatively efficent price (P(Q)=MC):



By setting the price equal to the intersection of the MC curve and demand curve, we see that the consumer surplus is now equal to what it would have been under perfect competition (thus the DWL is completely eliminated). It is represented by the right triangle area formed by the demand and the bottom horizontal dotted line.  However, the firm is now facing a large negative profit, equal to the area of the rectangle given by the three dotted lines. The firm will be forced to close if the government does not intervene. 


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 107-110. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...

Exercise: maximizing profit

Assume that you are the owner of a small business that produces T-shirts. Your the total revenue for your business can be modeled by the following equation: and your total cost corresponds to this function: Find the point at which your firm maximizes its profit. Then, find how much profit the firm if able to earn at that point. Using the total cost and total revenue functions we can set up the profit function: Then, realize that if you want to find the maximum profit, take the derivative of the function and set it up equal to zero, and solve for Q. This is equivalent of taking the derivative of the total cost and total revenue functions and setting them equal to each other. In this problem, I chose the latter option as it was explained in the previous lessons. Notice that profit is often denoted by a capital pi.  We are assuming that the TR>TC for some positive value, you can check for yourself. However, if we did not know that, we would first take the first ...

A short interlude...

Hello all, it's been quite some time since I have made any major announcements since the creation of this blog about a year and a half ago. I am currently in graduate school and will soon take a portion of my comprehensive examination (i.e exams in Micro, Macro, and Metrics that will allow me to continue my studies in my graduate program), wish me luck! Thus, I will not be able to post consistently until at least mid-June. The roadmap is as such, if I pass, I will start introductory lessons in Econometrics and Statistics (if not, then I'll have to study until I can retake the comps in August). I hope that once I am done, I will be able to add more advance materials to the blog, such as general equilibrium, indirect utility functions, and game theory/mechanism design for Micro. The Solow, Ramsey, RBC, New Keynesian models, permanent income hypothesis (PIH) and more for Macro. By the way I think I still need to add notes on the IS-LM curves, so I will do that before jumping to t...