Skip to main content

Microeconomics: Natural Monopoly

Notes on natural monopolies:

  • Recall that natural monopolies arise because they have economies of scale so large, their size prevents competition from smaller firms.


  • You can see the large area of the dead-weight loss that typically occurs in a natural monopoly. However, unlike other monopolies which can be broken up into smaller parts (see trust-busting), breaking up a natural monopoly would be less productively efficient as the ATC and MC curves would be higher. 

  • Government regulation of the firm's prices for its goods.
    • The government allows the monopoly to exist, since its economies of scale is so large, it produces at a much lower average total cost (ATC) than multiple smaller firms producing the same amount of goods.
    • The government's goal is to reduce the DWL.
The graphs below show the differences between a productively and allocatively efficient prices, using the graph of an unregulated natural monopoly used at the beginning of this lesson.

Productively efficient price (P(Q)=ATC):


You can see that by setting the price equal to the intersection of the demand curve to the ATC curve, the DWL is now smaller and the consumer surplus higher. Furthermore, the market is productively efficient.

Allocatively efficent price (P(Q)=MC):



By setting the price equal to the intersection of the MC curve and demand curve, we see that the consumer surplus is now equal to what it would have been under perfect competition (thus the DWL is completely eliminated). It is represented by the right triangle area formed by the demand and the bottom horizontal dotted line.  However, the firm is now facing a large negative profit, equal to the area of the rectangle given by the three dotted lines. The firm will be forced to close if the government does not intervene. 


Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 107-110. 

Labels:
Location: New York, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more