Skip to main content

Microeconomics: Oligopolistic firms

Definition of Oligopoly:

  • An oligopoly is a market structure where there is a limited number of firms that are allowed to enter in the market.
  • New firms face barriers to entry to access an oligopoly market:
    • Economies of scale give the already existing firms a low cost advantage over smaller entrants into the market.
    • Existing firms may work together to prevent new firms from accessing the market.
    • Older firms have name recognition that newer firms do not have.
  • A firm's best choices are influenced by one another's decisions. Thus, each firm needs to have strategy in order to make the best decision possible.
    • In an oligopoly market, firms can change their production and prices in reaction to a competitor's production (or pricing) decision.
    • Firms may be of unequal size, thus, one firm may be seen as the price leader, and the other firms set their prices in response to the leading firm.
Collusion and Cartels:
  • Oligopolistic firms have an incentive to collude, to set prices and productions.
  • If unregulated, collusion among firms may result in a cartel, which can be defined as an agreement not to compete, instead this group of firms behave like a monopoly by determining collectively the price and quantity to produce.
  • Cartels have a hard time subsisting in the long run due to the incentive to cheat. For example, one firm can decide to produce more, or lowering its price in order to increase their profit. 
Modeling Oligopolistic Behavior:
  • An oligopoly market can be modeled via a payoff matrix. A payoff matrix is simply a matrix that shows the possible outcomes when two agents make a decision (see game theory).
  • Assume that two firms form a oligopoly market and both try to maximize their profit. The payoff matrix below shows the daily profit given their choice to set a high or low price. 
Payoff Matrix: Firm A: high prices Firm A: low prices
Firm B: high pricesA: $1000
B: $1000		A: $1200
B: $500
Firm A: low pricesA: $500
B: $1200		A: $750
B: $750
  • If the firms compete, they will both earn a daily profit of $750. Low price is the dominant strategy, both firms will always choose the low price option as it is always the best response no matter what the other firm chooses.
    • Firm A is always better off by choosing a low price strategy. If firm B sets a high price then A makes an even bigger profit by choosing low price. If firm B sets a low price, then firm A still makes a bigger profit than if it had chosen to set at a high price. 
    • Choosing a low price is also the dominant strategy for firm B. This is not always the case, in some cases there can be no dominant strategy or only one firm has a dominant strategy.
  • If the firms decide to collude, they would both decide to charge a high price and earn each a $1000 daily profit. Both firms would rather earn a $1000 daily profit rather than $750. Also, notice that both have an incentive to cheat and earn $1200 by deciding to charge a low price while to other firm charges a high price. In the long run this will result in both earning a $750 daily profit.
Reference: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 119-122. 
Labels:
Location: New York, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market. Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm. What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)? Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium? Payoff Matrix:  Firm A: high prices  Firm A: low prices Firm B: high prices A: $1000 B: $1000 A: $1200 B: $800 Firm B: low prices A: $600 B: $1200 A: $700 B: $700 The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price). The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price. In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greate...
Post a Comment
Read more