Skip to main content

Exercise: Payoff matrix -Oligopoly market-

You are given a payoff matrix for two firms in an oligopoly market.

  • Find the dominant strategy (if any) for each firm.
  • What profit would they each earn if they form a cartel (if possible)?
  • Can the cartel hold in the long run? If not, what is the long run equilibrium?

Payoff Matrix: Firm A: high prices Firm A: low prices
Firm B: high pricesA: $1000
B: $1000
A: $1200
B: $800
Firm B: low pricesA: $600
B: $1200
A: $700
B: $700

The dominant strategy for firm A is to charge a low price for its product. You can see that no matter what firm B chooses, firm A is always better off by choosing the low price option (i.e its profit is always bigger than if it had charged a high price).

The strategy for firm B depends on the choices firm A makes. If firm A charges a high (low) price then firm B should charge a low (high) price.

In order to find the point at which the firms would collude (i.e act as one monopolistic firm), find the point(s) where the sum of economic profits is the greatest. Then choose the points that benefit both parties. In our case we see that the sum of the first entries in each column are equal to one another and greater than the rest of the sums in each entry in the matrix. As we will see, the long run equilibrium prevents the firms from colluding.
  • Since we know that the firm A will charge a low price, it makes sense for firm B to charge a high price in order to maximize its profit. Then, we see that the long run equilibrium is in the upper right entry of the payoff matrix. Firm A has no incentive to form a cartel with firm B. 

Reference: Exercise inspired by: Mayer,David. AP Microeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 123. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...

Exercise: maximizing profit

Assume that you are the owner of a small business that produces T-shirts. Your the total revenue for your business can be modeled by the following equation: and your total cost corresponds to this function: Find the point at which your firm maximizes its profit. Then, find how much profit the firm if able to earn at that point. Using the total cost and total revenue functions we can set up the profit function: Then, realize that if you want to find the maximum profit, take the derivative of the function and set it up equal to zero, and solve for Q. This is equivalent of taking the derivative of the total cost and total revenue functions and setting them equal to each other. In this problem, I chose the latter option as it was explained in the previous lessons. Notice that profit is often denoted by a capital pi.  We are assuming that the TR>TC for some positive value, you can check for yourself. However, if we did not know that, we would first take the first ...

A short interlude...

Hello all, it's been quite some time since I have made any major announcements since the creation of this blog about a year and a half ago. I am currently in graduate school and will soon take a portion of my comprehensive examination (i.e exams in Micro, Macro, and Metrics that will allow me to continue my studies in my graduate program), wish me luck! Thus, I will not be able to post consistently until at least mid-June. The roadmap is as such, if I pass, I will start introductory lessons in Econometrics and Statistics (if not, then I'll have to study until I can retake the comps in August). I hope that once I am done, I will be able to add more advance materials to the blog, such as general equilibrium, indirect utility functions, and game theory/mechanism design for Micro. The Solow, Ramsey, RBC, New Keynesian models, permanent income hypothesis (PIH) and more for Macro. By the way I think I still need to add notes on the IS-LM curves, so I will do that before jumping to t...