Skip to main content

Macroeconomics: determinants of aggregate supply

Determinants of aggregate supply:
  • In the short run, a change in AD will cause output to change and price level to change.
  • In the long run a change in AD will result in a change in price level only.
Shifts in SRAS:
  • The SRAS will shift to the left if there an increase in the costs of productions. This includes:
    • A wage increase, this can be achieved by strong labor unions, higher minimum wage, and a decrease in the labor force.
    • An increase in business taxes will increase costs, thereby shifting the SRAS to the left.
    • A general increase in input costs. Just as the previous point, this will increase the cost of production, shifting the SRAS to the left.
    • An increase interest rates, it is more expensive to replace machines (K), this will push to SRAS to the left.
  • An increase in costs of production is known as a negative supply shock, which causes the SRAS curve to shift to the left, increasing the equilibrium price level, and reducing the equilibrium output.

  • The SRAS will shift to the right if there is a reduction in the costs of productions.
    • lower wages, and lower input costs in general.
    • Lower business taxes
    • Lower interest rates
  • A decrease in the costs of production is known as a positive supply shock, which shifts the SRAS to the right, causing the level of output to increase and the equilibrium price level to decrease.
  • The LRAS shifts  any time there is an increase in the factor of production, or the factor of production become more productive.
    • Increase in labor force: an increase in population growth, immigration, or lowering the NRU. 
    • An increase in land resources, through territorial expositions or military conquest.
    • An increase in capital stock (i.e machines) which results from investments.
  • The factors of productions become more productive when:
    • A better educated and more skilled labor force.
    • Improvement in the quality of land resources, for example, increasing the agricultural yields.
    • An improvement in capital caused by technological innovations.
  • A decrease in LRAS result from the following:
    • A decrease in the size of the population, or the size of the labor force.
    • Reduction in land resources.
    • Reduction of capital stock caused by higher interest rates, wars, or natural disasters.
    • A deterioration of the nation's infrastructure or education system.
  • This list above will reduce the level of full-employment output in a nation over time and shift the LRAS to the left.
Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 130-134.

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Econometrics: Bivariate population model

    Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up

    Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

    Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,

    Econometrics: OLS estimates

      Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op