Skip to main content

Macroeconomics: equilibrium in the AD/AS model

Real output and price level in the AD/AS model:
  • The short run equilibrium in the AD/AS model, is when the  intersection between the short run aggregate supply curve and the aggregate demand curve determines the level of output and price level.
       
  • This short equilibrium output can be compared to the full-employment (i.e long run equilibrium) output by adding the long run aggregate supply curve in the graph. 
    • If the difference between the short run equilibrium output and full employment output is negative than we have a recessionary gap. This could be caused by a decrease in households' consumption, a fall in private investments, or a decrease in government spending.
    • If the difference is positive, we have an inflationary gap, where the short run equilibrium output is bigger than its full employment output. This can be caused by an increase in households expenditures, expansionary fiscal policy, etc...
    • If the gap is zero, this means that the short run equilibrium output occurs at the full employment level of output. This means that this nation is achieving its macroeconomics objectives of stable prices (i.e stable inflation rate), and full employment. Thus, in the long run, its price level and output will not change.
Short run to long run AD/AS model:
  • In the long run a nation will always produce at its full employment level of output, regardless of its AD curve.
  • In the long run, wages and prices are perfectly flexible. Following a decrease in the aggregate demand, in the long run:
    • The SRAS shifts to the right, since firms are layoff workers. This increase in the size of the unemployed in the labor force causes the wage rate to fall.  
    • Output return to full employment because the lower prices (thanks to lower wages) increase the quantity of national output demanded over time.
    • The workers' nominal wages are lower, however the real wages (represented by real income, i.e GDP) are the same as they used to be before the fall in AD.
  • In this example, the movement in the SRAS relies on the fall in wages. However, this might take a long time. It might be quicker to "push" the AD to the right via fiscal expansionary policies.
  • Following an increase in the AD in the long run:
    • The SRAS will shift to the left as unemployment rate falls below the NRU, increasing the scarcity of labor, driving up the wage rate.
    • Output will return to the full employment level since higher prices caused by the higher wages will reduce the quantity of national output demanded over time.
    • workers' nominal wages are higher, but their real wages are the same as they were before the increase in AD.

Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 135-142.

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Econometrics: Bivariate population model

    Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up

    Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

    Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,

    Econometrics: OLS estimates

      Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op