Skip to main content

Exercise: Money market

 

Assume that you have the following information about the Dm and Sm curves:

If the RRR is 15%, find the maximum effect on the money supply when the Fed buys a quarter of a million dollars worth of bonds from commercial banks. What is the new nominal interest rate at equilibrium?

  • Calculate the original equilibrium nominal interest rate:
  • Calculate the maximum effect from the Fed's action:
  • Find the new Sm curve (assuming max effect):
  • Find the new nominal interest rate at equilibrium:

Let's graph that:



Now assume that the expected inflation is supposed to be 0.2%, find the effect of the central bank on the loanable funds market (just show the effect on the demand curve). What is the old and new real interest rate at equilibrium.


Let's graph that:



Finally describes the impact of the Fed's action on the AD/AS model in the short run.
  • The variable I (for investment) goes up which implies that the aggregate demand curve shifts to the right. Putting upward pressure on the price level, and increasing the level of employment and output. This is an example of an expansionary monetary policy.

Labels:
Location: Boston, MA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up
Post a Comment
Read more

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,
Post a Comment
Read more

Econometrics: OLS estimates

  Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op
Post a Comment
Read more