Skip to main content

Macroeconomics: different types of inflation and methods to stabilize inflation

 

Types of inflation:

  • Demand pull inflation: caused by a rightward shift in the aggregate demand. The increased in consumption among consumers for a limited amount of goods forces prices to rise.
    • When the economy is below full employment, an increase in AD does not drastically change the price level, since the economy is not fully using its resources (workers and machines) and can therefore easily increase production.
    • When the economy is at full employment, an increase in AD causes a large increase in inflation, it becomes relatively more costly to increase production.
  • Methods for reducing demand pull inflation:
    • Contractionary fiscal policies: raising taxes or reducing the government spending, will put downward pressure on the aggregate demand, and thereby reduces its rightward shift.
    • Contractionary monetary policies: Usually, the central bank is the entity that deals with inflation. It does so by increasing the federal funds rate through open market transaction, which decreases the supply of money in the system.
  • Cost-push inflation: caused by an increase in the cost of production, a shift in the short run aggregate supply to the left.
    • This can be caused by an increase in the price of raw materials, or in energy and transportation cost. Higher business taxes can also have this effect.
  • Methods for reducing cost-push inflation:
    • Contractionary demand side policies: will reduce inflation by shifting the AD to the left, however, it will also increase the unemployment level and increase the level of economic contraction. Might need a larger fiscal and monetary stimulus in the future.
    • Expansionary supply side policies: corrects both the unemployment and inflation levels. Here are a few examples: reducing business taxes, minimum wage, subsidies for energy or transportation.
Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 203-208.

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Econometrics: Bivariate population model

    Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up

    Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

    Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,

    Econometrics: OLS estimates

      Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op