Skip to main content

Macroeconomics: long run effects of fiscal and monetary policies

 

  • As a reminder, in the long run, wages and prices are considered variables in the economy. Thus in periods of economic expansions, workers will demand higher wages due to the pressure on the labor market (higher demand), increasing costs to firms, shifting the SRAS to the left. They opposite effect happens during periods of economic contraction.
  • Expansionary policies have no direct effect on the long run level of full employment. It can be the case that a positive demand side policy also has a positive supply side effect. 
    • Expansionary monetary policy, and its effect on the LRAS: lower interest rates implies more investment which implies more capital (i.e machines), making the workers more productive, leading to economic growth (i.e increasing the level of output in the long run).
    • More investment does shift the AD to the right but so do the LRAS and SRAS curves.
  • Contractionary demand side policies can have an impact on the long run level of full employment if and only if the policy has an effect on the productive capacity of the economy.
    • Say a new fiscal policy aims at reducing spending in education and health, this will reduce the productivity of the workers in the economy, the long run level of output will decline. 
    • Note that less government spending will reduce the variable G, shifting the AD curve to the left, but so will the SRAS and LRAS curves.
Fiscal vs monetary policies:
  • Depending on how large a recession is, fiscal policy might be more effective than monetary policy. If the demand for investment is very steep, then expansionary monetary policy has little effect on the economy. Also the zero lower bound or liquidity trap is another problem (see also QE policies). 
  • Fiscal policies in such cases might be more effective, since they directly injects funds into the circular flow and move the AD curve to the right. Furthermore, when saving is high and investment level low, the government can borrow at a relatively cheap rate.
    • high unemployment rate implies that fiscal policy can greatly reduce it, while having little effect on the inflation rate.
  • One can usually think of monetary policies as a tool to regulate the economy when it deviates from its trend by some small epsilon, whereas fiscal policies are used during major economic contractions. 
Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 192-202.

Labels:
Location: Boston, MA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exercise: inflation and GDP deflator

You have the following table containing information about country Y's GDP deflator, nominal, and real GDP. If the base year is 2015, fill in the blanks and then find the annual inflation rate for each year. Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 2016 $25,752 ... $23,943 2017 $25,982 108.1 ... 2018 $26,016 ... $25,431.1 2019 $26,323 105.5 ... Solution: Year  Nominal GDP  GDP Deflator  Real GDP   Inflation rate 2015 $23,457 100 $23,457 n.a 2016 $25,752 107.6 $23,943 7.6% 2017 $25,982 108.1 $24,035.2 0.45% 2018 $26,016 102.3 $25,431.1 -5.37% 2019 $26,323 105.5 $24,950.6 3.13%  GDP deflator for the year 2018: Real GDP for the year 2017: General formula to find real GDP by re-arranging the GDP deflator formula: Notice that the sub-index i is for the year. The (annual) inflation rate is simply the growth rate of prices from a year to its previous year: Inflation rate of the year 2018: Notice that in 2018 country Y experienced...
Post a Comment
Read more

Microeconomics: Factor Markets

Definition: Factor markets: markets for the factors of production (example: labor and capital). Markets are formed whenever consumers and producers meet to exchange goods or services. Deriving factor demand: the demand for goods or services in the product markets creates demand for the factors of production.  An increase (decrease) in demand for good X leads the suppliers to increase their production thereby increasing (decreasing) the demand for the factors of production.   Marginal revenue product: The demand for the factor of production is formed by multiplying a firm's marginal revenue by its marginal product.  Remember that by taking the derivative of the TR function with respect to Q we are able to find the MR. Marginal product on the other hand is found by taking the derivative of the production function with respect to a factor of production (L or K for example). Marginal revenue product (MRP): the change in total revenue when one more input is employed. It decrea...
Post a Comment
Read more