Skip to main content

Macroeconomics: long run effects of fiscal and monetary policies

 

  • As a reminder, in the long run, wages and prices are considered variables in the economy. Thus in periods of economic expansions, workers will demand higher wages due to the pressure on the labor market (higher demand), increasing costs to firms, shifting the SRAS to the left. They opposite effect happens during periods of economic contraction.
  • Expansionary policies have no direct effect on the long run level of full employment. It can be the case that a positive demand side policy also has a positive supply side effect. 
    • Expansionary monetary policy, and its effect on the LRAS: lower interest rates implies more investment which implies more capital (i.e machines), making the workers more productive, leading to economic growth (i.e increasing the level of output in the long run).
    • More investment does shift the AD to the right but so do the LRAS and SRAS curves.
  • Contractionary demand side policies can have an impact on the long run level of full employment if and only if the policy has an effect on the productive capacity of the economy.
    • Say a new fiscal policy aims at reducing spending in education and health, this will reduce the productivity of the workers in the economy, the long run level of output will decline. 
    • Note that less government spending will reduce the variable G, shifting the AD curve to the left, but so will the SRAS and LRAS curves.
Fiscal vs monetary policies:
  • Depending on how large a recession is, fiscal policy might be more effective than monetary policy. If the demand for investment is very steep, then expansionary monetary policy has little effect on the economy. Also the zero lower bound or liquidity trap is another problem (see also QE policies). 
  • Fiscal policies in such cases might be more effective, since they directly injects funds into the circular flow and move the AD curve to the right. Furthermore, when saving is high and investment level low, the government can borrow at a relatively cheap rate.
    • high unemployment rate implies that fiscal policy can greatly reduce it, while having little effect on the inflation rate.
  • One can usually think of monetary policies as a tool to regulate the economy when it deviates from its trend by some small epsilon, whereas fiscal policies are used during major economic contractions. 
Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 192-202.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest ...

Exercise: maximizing profit

Assume that you are the owner of a small business that produces T-shirts. Your the total revenue for your business can be modeled by the following equation: and your total cost corresponds to this function: Find the point at which your firm maximizes its profit. Then, find how much profit the firm if able to earn at that point. Using the total cost and total revenue functions we can set up the profit function: Then, realize that if you want to find the maximum profit, take the derivative of the function and set it up equal to zero, and solve for Q. This is equivalent of taking the derivative of the total cost and total revenue functions and setting them equal to each other. In this problem, I chose the latter option as it was explained in the previous lessons. Notice that profit is often denoted by a capital pi.  We are assuming that the TR>TC for some positive value, you can check for yourself. However, if we did not know that, we would first take the first ...

A short interlude...

Hello all, it's been quite some time since I have made any major announcements since the creation of this blog about a year and a half ago. I am currently in graduate school and will soon take a portion of my comprehensive examination (i.e exams in Micro, Macro, and Metrics that will allow me to continue my studies in my graduate program), wish me luck! Thus, I will not be able to post consistently until at least mid-June. The roadmap is as such, if I pass, I will start introductory lessons in Econometrics and Statistics (if not, then I'll have to study until I can retake the comps in August). I hope that once I am done, I will be able to add more advance materials to the blog, such as general equilibrium, indirect utility functions, and game theory/mechanism design for Micro. The Solow, Ramsey, RBC, New Keynesian models, permanent income hypothesis (PIH) and more for Macro. By the way I think I still need to add notes on the IS-LM curves, so I will do that before jumping to t...