Macroeconomics: long run effects of fiscal and monetary policies

As a reminder, in the long run, wages and prices are considered variables in the economy. Thus in periods of economic expansions, workers will demand higher wages due to the pressure on the labor market (higher demand), increasing costs to firms, shifting the SRAS to the left. They opposite effect happens during periods of economic contraction.

Expansionary policies have no direct effect on the long run level of full employment. It can be the case that a positive demand side policy also has a positive supply side effect.

Expansionary monetary policy, and its effect on the LRAS: lower interest rates implies more investment which implies more capital (i.e machines), making the workers more productive, leading to economic growth (i.e increasing the level of output in the long run).

More investment does shift the AD to the right but so do the LRAS and SRAS curves.

Contractionary demand side policies can have an impact on the long run level of full employment if and only if the policy has an effect on the productive capacity of the economy.

Say a new fiscal policy aims at reducing spending in education and health, this will reduce the productivity of the workers in the economy, the long run level of output will decline.

Note that less government spending will reduce the variable G, shifting the AD curve to the left, but so will the SRAS and LRAS curves.

Fiscal vs monetary policies:

Depending on how large a recession is, fiscal policy might be more effective than monetary policy. If the demand for investment is very steep, then expansionary monetary policy has little effect on the economy. Also the zero lower bound or liquidity trap is another problem (see also QE policies).

Fiscal policies in such cases might be more effective, since they directly injects funds into the circular flow and move the AD curve to the right. Furthermore, when saving is high and investment level low, the government can borrow at a relatively cheap rate.

high unemployment rate implies that fiscal policy can greatly reduce it, while having little effect on the inflation rate.

One can usually think of monetary policies as a tool to regulate the economy when it deviates from its trend by some small epsilon, whereas fiscal policies are used during major economic contractions.

Reference: Welker, Jason. AP Maroeconomics Crash Course. Research & Education Association (2014). p 192-202.

Comments

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics. Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y. beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP). Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,

Econometrics: OLS estimates

Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then: Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op

Economics and Statistics

Search This Blog