Skip to main content

Exercise: pegged exchange rate

  • Assume that the U.S government wants to start fixing its currency against the Mexican peso. Government officials estimate that the optimal exchange rate should be at one peso for $0.35.
  •  You are given the following information about the U.S market for Mexican peso:
  • Find how much peso does the U.S needs to buy or sell in order to achieve its targeted exchange rate.
    • Find the original equilibrium exchange rate: let the demand equal to the supply curve. Just like in the previous exercise, we see that one peso is worth half a U.S dollar and there are 6,250,000 pesos demanded at this price.
    • Now, in order to change the exchange rate, realize that the U.S government has access to U.S dollars (for the sake of the argument, assume the central bank is no longer independent). Then, it can only shift the demand for Mexican pesos in the U.S foreign exchange market.
    • Thus, there must only be a movement along the supply curve, set $=0.35 in the supply schedule and solve for p.
    • Now, calculate the gap between the new equilibrium exchange rate and the exchange rate given in the old demand:
    • Substract that gap from the original demand and obtain the new demand curve. Set the new demand curve equal to the supply curve and solve the system. We see that in order to obtain this new exchange rate, the U.S government needs to sell 1,500,000 worth of Mexican financial assets in order to buy back U.S dollars. This is the difference between the old and new equilibrium amount of Mexican pesos.
    • Note that since the Mexican peso is depreciating, it must be the case that the U.S dollar is appreciating. 
  • Let's graph that:

Labels:
Location: Boston, MA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Econometrics: Bivariate population model

Hello I'm finally back from my extended break. I thought that we should start studying Econometrics.  Let's begin by analyzing a simple bivariate regression. Assume that this equation describes the relationship between two variables X and Y. We say that Y is the dependent variable, whereas X is the independent variable. In other words, we assume that Y (the output) depends on X (the input). Epsilon is the error term, it represents other factors that affect Y. The error term must be uncorrelated with the variable X so that we do not need to include them in our regression, and thus the coefficient of X (beta) should not change, even though Epsilon also determines Y.  beta-0 is the constant term. It tells us what would be Y if X=0. beta-1 is the effect on Y if X changes by one unit. To see this, assume X=education is a continuous function, let's take the derivative of Y=wage with respect to X: Thus, if education goes up by one unit, we should expect, on average, wage to go up
Post a Comment
Read more

Macroeconomics: multiplier and crowding out effects

Multiplier effect: whenever   any of the components of AD increases, the increase in GDP will be greater than the initial increase in expenditures. The impact on GDP of a particular increase in spending depends on the proportion of the new income that is taken out of the system to the proportion that continues to circulate in the economy. The multiplier effect tells us the impact a particular change in one the components of AD will have on the total income (GDP).  Let k denote the spending multiplier, which is a function of MPC and MPS. The larger the marginal propensity to consume, the larger the spending multiplier. Notice that the larger the MPC, the greater the impact a particular change in the spending variables will have on the nation's GDP. The crowding out effect: If government spending increases without an increase in taxes, the government must borrow funds from the private sector to finance its deficit, thereby increasing the interest rate. This increase in interest rate,
Post a Comment
Read more

Econometrics: OLS estimates

  Let X and Y be column vectors and the sample has the size n: The vector beta contains both the coefficient of X as well as the coefficient for the intercept. This is equivalent to writing this equation: We will assume that the expected value of the error term is 0 (this can be done by construction), and that X is uncorrelated to epsilon. Assume the following is for population data. Let's prove that statement: Since we know that the covariance between X and epsilon is 0, it follows that the expected value of X times the error term must also be 0. Since we do not have access to the actual expected value of the distribution, let's use the sample data instead: The hat on the covariance signifies that this is a MM estimator. Let's use the fact that the sample mean of epsilon is also equal to 0, then:   Using the estimation for the covariance and that the expected value of the error term equals 0: Then we have: To get this result, you must use the properties of the summation op
Post a Comment
Read more